- Secrecy claims are now handled fairly okayish, as long as only one
term is in the claim. This should be tupling-or, really, for convenience.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ commEvent (int event, Tac tc)
|
||||
cl->protocol = thisProtocol;
|
||||
cl->rolename = fromrole;
|
||||
cl->role = thisRole;
|
||||
cl->roledef = NULL;
|
||||
cl->count = 0;
|
||||
cl->failed = 0;
|
||||
cl->prec = NULL;
|
||||
@@ -1113,6 +1114,8 @@ compute_prec_sets (const System sys)
|
||||
// Store in claimlist structure
|
||||
cl->r = r1;
|
||||
cl->ev = ev1;
|
||||
cl->roledef = rd;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We have found the claim roledef, and r1,ev1
|
||||
* Now we compute the preceding label set
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user