fix: fix memory leaks related to updating config variables
adds an edge case in analysis.makeScopeInternal to prevent leaking memory when adding duplicate container fields w/ name "other"
This commit is contained in:
parent
3e20a7a50b
commit
2c5ae262f7
@ -200,22 +200,18 @@ pub fn configChanged(config: *Config, allocator: std.mem.Allocator, builtin_crea
|
|||||||
config.builtin_path = try std.fs.path.join(allocator, &.{ builtin_creation_dir.?, "builtin.zig" });
|
config.builtin_path = try std.fs.path.join(allocator, &.{ builtin_creation_dir.?, "builtin.zig" });
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
config.build_runner_path = if (config.build_runner_path) |p|
|
if (null == config.build_runner_path) {
|
||||||
try allocator.dupe(u8, p)
|
|
||||||
else blk: {
|
|
||||||
var exe_dir_bytes: [std.fs.MAX_PATH_BYTES]u8 = undefined;
|
var exe_dir_bytes: [std.fs.MAX_PATH_BYTES]u8 = undefined;
|
||||||
const exe_dir_path = try std.fs.selfExeDirPath(&exe_dir_bytes);
|
const exe_dir_path = try std.fs.selfExeDirPath(&exe_dir_bytes);
|
||||||
break :blk try std.fs.path.resolve(allocator, &[_][]const u8{ exe_dir_path, "build_runner.zig" });
|
config.build_runner_path = try std.fs.path.resolve(allocator, &[_][]const u8{ exe_dir_path, "build_runner.zig" });
|
||||||
};
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
config.global_cache_path = if (config.global_cache_path) |p|
|
if (null == config.global_cache_path) {
|
||||||
try allocator.dupe(u8, p)
|
|
||||||
else blk: {
|
|
||||||
const cache_dir_path = (try known_folders.getPath(allocator, .cache)) orelse {
|
const cache_dir_path = (try known_folders.getPath(allocator, .cache)) orelse {
|
||||||
logger.warn("Known-folders could not fetch the cache path", .{});
|
logger.warn("Known-folders could not fetch the cache path", .{});
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
defer allocator.free(cache_dir_path);
|
defer allocator.free(cache_dir_path);
|
||||||
break :blk try std.fs.path.resolve(allocator, &[_][]const u8{ cache_dir_path, "zls" });
|
config.global_cache_path = try std.fs.path.resolve(allocator, &[_][]const u8{ cache_dir_path, "zls" });
|
||||||
};
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -2440,7 +2440,11 @@ pub fn processJsonRpc(server: *Server, writer: anytype, json: []const u8) !void
|
|||||||
if (value != .Null) {
|
if (value != .Null) {
|
||||||
const new_value: field.field_type = switch (ft) {
|
const new_value: field.field_type = switch (ft) {
|
||||||
[]const u8 => switch (value) {
|
[]const u8 => switch (value) {
|
||||||
.String => |s| try server.allocator.dupe(u8, s), // TODO: Allocation model? (same with didChangeConfiguration); imo this isn't *that* bad but still
|
.String => |s| blk: {
|
||||||
|
var nv = try server.allocator.dupe(u8, s);
|
||||||
|
server.allocator.free(@field(server.config, field.name).?);
|
||||||
|
break :blk nv;
|
||||||
|
}, // TODO: Allocation model? (same with didChangeConfiguration); imo this isn't *that* bad but still
|
||||||
else => @panic("Invalid configuration value"), // TODO: Handle this
|
else => @panic("Invalid configuration value"), // TODO: Handle this
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
else => switch (ti) {
|
else => switch (ti) {
|
||||||
|
@ -2542,7 +2542,7 @@ fn makeInnerScope(allocator: std.mem.Allocator, context: ScopeContext, node_idx:
|
|||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (container_field) |_| {
|
if (container_field) |_| {
|
||||||
if (!std.mem.eql(u8, name, "_")) {
|
if (!std.mem.eql(u8, name, "_") and !std.mem.eql(u8, name, "other")) {
|
||||||
try context.enums.put(allocator, .{
|
try context.enums.put(allocator, .{
|
||||||
.label = name,
|
.label = name,
|
||||||
.kind = .Constant,
|
.kind = .Constant,
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user