Sylv/scyther
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

- Removed some too interesting pruning methods that really need theorems

Browse Source 
first. Revealed by the certified e-mail protocol by Abadi and
  Blanchet.
This commit is contained in:
ccremers
2006-01-17 16:18:26 +00:00
parent 3ed59b867a
commit bb7259a1ad
5 changed files with 80 additions and 24 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

39
src/arachne.c
View File

@@ -1452,8 +1452,6 @@ bind_goal (const Binding b)
if (!b->done)
{
int flag;
int know_only;
Term function;
flag = 1;
proof_select_goal (b);
@@ -1481,26 +1479,35 @@ bind_goal (const Binding b)
}
else
{
// Prune: if it is an SK type construct, ready
// No regular run will apply SK for you.
//!@todo This still needs a lemma, and a more generic (correct) algorithm!!
int know_only;
know_only = 0;
function = getTermFunction (b->term);
if (function != NULL)
if (1 == 0) // blocked for now
{
if (!inKnowledge (sys->know, function))
// Prune: if it is an SK type construct, ready
// No regular run will apply SK for you.
//!@todo This still needs a lemma, and a more generic (correct) algorithm!! It is currently
// actually false, e.g. for signing protocols, and password-like functions.
//
Term function;
function = getTermFunction (b->term);
if (function != NULL)
{
// Prune because we didn't know it before, and it is never subterm-sent
if (switches.output == PROOF)
if (!inKnowledge (sys->know, function))
{
indentPrint ();
eprintf ("* Because ");
termPrint (b->term);
eprintf
(" is never sent from a regular run, so we only intruder construct it.\n");
// Prune because we didn't know it before, and it is never subterm-sent
if (switches.output == PROOF)
{
indentPrint ();
eprintf ("* Because ");
termPrint (b->term);
eprintf
(" is never sent from a regular run, so we only intruder construct it.\n");
}
know_only = 1;
}
know_only = 1;
}
}