- Test out a possible way to model key compromise:
Add a role that sends out all messages that would occur in a legit run of the protocol including the session key (simulating a previously recorded run with its compromised session key) - Adding a directory to play around with key compromise
This commit is contained in:
parent
b212e0b1ec
commit
ba47af0c42
94
spdl/SPORE/key-compromise/needham-schroeder-sk.spdl
Normal file
94
spdl/SPORE/key-compromise/needham-schroeder-sk.spdl
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
|
||||
# Needham Schroeder Symmetric Key
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Modelled after the description in the SPORE library
|
||||
# http://www.lsv.ens-cachan.fr/spore/nssk.html
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Note:
|
||||
# This protocol uses a ticket so scyther will only be able to verify
|
||||
# the protocol using the ARACHNE engine (-a)
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
secret k: Function;
|
||||
# Model dec that is invertible by inc
|
||||
const dec,inc: Function;
|
||||
inversekeys(dec,inc);
|
||||
usertype SessionKey;
|
||||
|
||||
protocol needhamschroederSessionKeyCompromise(I,R,S)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Disclose an entire session and the corresponding session key
|
||||
// to simulate key compromise
|
||||
role I {
|
||||
const Ni,Nr: Nonce;
|
||||
const Kir: SessionKey;
|
||||
|
||||
send_D1(I,I, (I,R,Ni),
|
||||
{Ni,R,Kir,{Kir,I}k(R,S)}k(I,S),
|
||||
{Kir,I}k(R,S),
|
||||
{Nr}Kir,
|
||||
{{Nr}dec}Kir,
|
||||
Kir
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
role R {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
role S {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
protocol needhamschroedersk(I,R,S)
|
||||
{
|
||||
role I
|
||||
{
|
||||
const Ni: Nonce;
|
||||
var Nr: Nonce;
|
||||
var Kir: SessionKey;
|
||||
var T: Ticket;
|
||||
|
||||
send_1(I,S,(I,R,Ni));
|
||||
read_2(S,I, {Ni,R,Kir,T}k(I,S));
|
||||
send_3(I,R,T);
|
||||
read_4(R,I,{Nr}Kir);
|
||||
send_5(I,R,{{Nr}dec}Kir);
|
||||
claim_I2(I,Secret,Kir);
|
||||
claim_I3(I,Nisynch);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
role R
|
||||
{
|
||||
const Nr: Nonce;
|
||||
var Kir: SessionKey;
|
||||
|
||||
read_3(I,R,{Kir,I}k(R,S));
|
||||
send_4(R,I,{Nr}Kir);
|
||||
read_5(I,R,{{Nr}dec}Kir);
|
||||
claim_R1(R,Secret,Kir);
|
||||
claim_R3(R,Nisynch);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
role S
|
||||
{
|
||||
var Ni: Nonce;
|
||||
const Kir: SessionKey;
|
||||
read_1(I,S,(I,R,Ni));
|
||||
send_2(S,I,{Ni,R,Kir,{Kir,I}k(R,S)}k(I,S));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const Alice,Bob,Simon,Eve: Agent;
|
||||
|
||||
untrusted Eve;
|
||||
const ne: Nonce;
|
||||
compromised k(Eve,Simon);
|
||||
|
||||
# General scenario, 2 parallel runs of the protocol
|
||||
|
||||
run needhamschroedersk.I(Agent,Agent,Simon);
|
||||
run needhamschroedersk.R(Agent,Agent,Simon);
|
||||
run needhamschroedersk.S(Agent,Agent,Simon);
|
||||
run needhamschroedersk.I(Agent,Agent,Simon);
|
||||
run needhamschroedersk.R(Agent,Agent,Simon);
|
||||
run needhamschroedersk.S(Agent,Agent,Simon);
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user