- Added claim symmetry reduction; this doesn't help much for lower
number of runs. It is on by default.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f96c9077a
commit
742a65bac1
@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
"disable no more claims reductions");
|
||||
struct arg_lit *switch_disable_endgame_reductions =
|
||||
arg_lit0 (NULL, "no-endgame-red", "disable endgame reductions");
|
||||
struct arg_lit *switch_disable_claim_symmetry =
|
||||
arg_lit0 (NULL, "no-claimsymmetry-red",
|
||||
"disable claim symmetry reductions");
|
||||
struct arg_lit *switch_summary = arg_lit0 (NULL, "summary",
|
||||
"show summary on stdout instead of stderr");
|
||||
struct arg_lit *switch_echo =
|
||||
@ -178,6 +181,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
switch_disable_agent_symmetries,
|
||||
switch_disable_noclaims_reductions,
|
||||
switch_disable_endgame_reductions,
|
||||
switch_disable_claim_symmetry,
|
||||
#ifdef DEBUG
|
||||
switch_por_parameter,
|
||||
switch_debug_indent,
|
||||
@ -368,6 +372,8 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
sys->switchNomoreClaims = 0; /* disable no more claims cutter */
|
||||
if (switch_disable_endgame_reductions->count > 0)
|
||||
sys->switchReduceEndgame = 0; /* disable endgame cutter */
|
||||
if (switch_disable_claim_symmetry->count > 0)
|
||||
sys->switchReduceClaims = 0; /* disable claim symmetry cutter */
|
||||
if (switch_summary->count > 0)
|
||||
sys->output = SUMMARY; /* report summary on stdout */
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -237,21 +237,11 @@ executeStep (const System sys, const int run)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Determine for a roledef that is instantiated, the uninteresting ends bits.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*@todo "What is interesting" relies on the fact that there are only secrecy, sychnr and agreement properties.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
//! Determine end of run after removing end reads, and optionally claims.
|
||||
Roledef
|
||||
removeIrrelevant (const System sys, const int run, Roledef rd)
|
||||
removeDangling (Roledef rd, const int killclaims)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Roledef rdkill;
|
||||
int killclaims;
|
||||
|
||||
if (untrustedAgent (sys, sys->runs[run].agents))
|
||||
killclaims = 1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
killclaims = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
rdkill = rd;
|
||||
while (rd != NULL)
|
||||
@ -260,26 +250,30 @@ removeIrrelevant (const System sys, const int run, Roledef rd)
|
||||
rdkill = rd;
|
||||
rd = rd->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* report part */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
rd = rdkill->next;
|
||||
killclaims = 0;
|
||||
while (rd != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
killclaims++;
|
||||
rd = rd->next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (killclaims > 1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
warning ("%i events stripped from run %i.", killclaims, run);
|
||||
runPrint (rdkill->next);
|
||||
}
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/* remove after rdkill */
|
||||
return rdkill;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Determine for a roledef that is instantiated, the uninteresting ends bits.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*@todo "What is interesting" relies on the fact that there are only secrecy, sychnr and agreement properties.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
Roledef
|
||||
removeIrrelevant (const System sys, const int run, Roledef rd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (untrustedAgent (sys, sys->runs[run].agents))
|
||||
{
|
||||
// untrusted, so also remove claims
|
||||
return removeDangling (rd, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// trusted, so only remove reads
|
||||
return removeDangling (rd, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
//! Unblock any waiting sends of my type.
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@ -438,19 +432,29 @@ explorify (const System sys, const int run)
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* dependent run has chosen, so we can compare */
|
||||
if (termlistOrder (sys->runs[run].agents,
|
||||
sys->runs[ridSymm].agents) < 0)
|
||||
int order;
|
||||
|
||||
order =
|
||||
termlistOrder (sys->runs[run].agents,
|
||||
sys->runs[ridSymm].agents);
|
||||
if (order < 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* we only explore the other half */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (order == 0 && sys->switchReduceClaims)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* identical run; only the first would be checked for a claim */
|
||||
/* so we cut off this run, including claims, turning it into a dummy run */
|
||||
roleCap = removeDangling (rd, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Special check 3: if after choosing, this run ends on (read|skippedclaim)*, we can remove that part already.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (sys->switchReduceEndgame)
|
||||
if (sys->switchReduceEndgame && roleCap == NULL)
|
||||
roleCap = removeIrrelevant (sys, run, rd);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Special check x: if all agents in each run send only encrypted stuff, and all agents are trusted,
|
||||
|
@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ systemInit ()
|
||||
sys->switchSymmOrder = 0; // don't force symmetry order reduction by default
|
||||
sys->switchNomoreClaims = 1; // default cutter when there are no more claims
|
||||
sys->switchReduceEndgame = 1; // default cutter of last events in a trace
|
||||
sys->switchReduceClaims = 1; // default remove claims from duplicate instance choosers
|
||||
sys->switchClaims = 0; // default don't report on claims
|
||||
sys->switchClaimToCheck = NULL; // default check all claims
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ struct system
|
||||
int switchSymmOrder; //!< Enable symmetry order reduction
|
||||
int switchNomoreClaims; //!< Enable no more claims cutter
|
||||
int switchReduceEndgame; //!< Enable endgame cutter
|
||||
int switchReduceClaims; //!< Symmetry reduction on claims (only works when switchAgentSymm is true)
|
||||
int switchClaims; //!< Enable clails report
|
||||
Term switchClaimToCheck; //!< Which claim should be checked?
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user