- Added claim symmetry reduction; this doesn't help much for lower

number of runs. It is on by default.
This commit is contained in:
ccremers 2004-08-11 08:17:49 +00:00
parent 1f96c9077a
commit 742a65bac1
4 changed files with 45 additions and 33 deletions

View File

@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
"disable no more claims reductions"); "disable no more claims reductions");
struct arg_lit *switch_disable_endgame_reductions = struct arg_lit *switch_disable_endgame_reductions =
arg_lit0 (NULL, "no-endgame-red", "disable endgame reductions"); arg_lit0 (NULL, "no-endgame-red", "disable endgame reductions");
struct arg_lit *switch_disable_claim_symmetry =
arg_lit0 (NULL, "no-claimsymmetry-red",
"disable claim symmetry reductions");
struct arg_lit *switch_summary = arg_lit0 (NULL, "summary", struct arg_lit *switch_summary = arg_lit0 (NULL, "summary",
"show summary on stdout instead of stderr"); "show summary on stdout instead of stderr");
struct arg_lit *switch_echo = struct arg_lit *switch_echo =
@ -178,6 +181,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
switch_disable_agent_symmetries, switch_disable_agent_symmetries,
switch_disable_noclaims_reductions, switch_disable_noclaims_reductions,
switch_disable_endgame_reductions, switch_disable_endgame_reductions,
switch_disable_claim_symmetry,
#ifdef DEBUG #ifdef DEBUG
switch_por_parameter, switch_por_parameter,
switch_debug_indent, switch_debug_indent,
@ -368,6 +372,8 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
sys->switchNomoreClaims = 0; /* disable no more claims cutter */ sys->switchNomoreClaims = 0; /* disable no more claims cutter */
if (switch_disable_endgame_reductions->count > 0) if (switch_disable_endgame_reductions->count > 0)
sys->switchReduceEndgame = 0; /* disable endgame cutter */ sys->switchReduceEndgame = 0; /* disable endgame cutter */
if (switch_disable_claim_symmetry->count > 0)
sys->switchReduceClaims = 0; /* disable claim symmetry cutter */
if (switch_summary->count > 0) if (switch_summary->count > 0)
sys->output = SUMMARY; /* report summary on stdout */ sys->output = SUMMARY; /* report summary on stdout */

View File

@ -237,21 +237,11 @@ executeStep (const System sys, const int run)
return 1; return 1;
} }
/** //! Determine end of run after removing end reads, and optionally claims.
* Determine for a roledef that is instantiated, the uninteresting ends bits.
*
*@todo "What is interesting" relies on the fact that there are only secrecy, sychnr and agreement properties.
*/
Roledef Roledef
removeIrrelevant (const System sys, const int run, Roledef rd) removeDangling (Roledef rd, const int killclaims)
{ {
Roledef rdkill; Roledef rdkill;
int killclaims;
if (untrustedAgent (sys, sys->runs[run].agents))
killclaims = 1;
else
killclaims = 0;
rdkill = rd; rdkill = rd;
while (rd != NULL) while (rd != NULL)
@ -260,26 +250,30 @@ removeIrrelevant (const System sys, const int run, Roledef rd)
rdkill = rd; rdkill = rd;
rd = rd->next; rd = rd->next;
} }
/* report part */
/*
rd = rdkill->next;
killclaims = 0;
while (rd != NULL)
{
killclaims++;
rd = rd->next;
}
if (killclaims > 1)
{
warning ("%i events stripped from run %i.", killclaims, run);
runPrint (rdkill->next);
}
*/
/* remove after rdkill */ /* remove after rdkill */
return rdkill; return rdkill;
} }
/**
* Determine for a roledef that is instantiated, the uninteresting ends bits.
*
*@todo "What is interesting" relies on the fact that there are only secrecy, sychnr and agreement properties.
*/
Roledef
removeIrrelevant (const System sys, const int run, Roledef rd)
{
if (untrustedAgent (sys, sys->runs[run].agents))
{
// untrusted, so also remove claims
return removeDangling (rd, 1);
}
else
{
// trusted, so only remove reads
return removeDangling (rd, 0);
}
}
//! Unblock any waiting sends of my type. //! Unblock any waiting sends of my type.
/** /**
@ -438,19 +432,29 @@ explorify (const System sys, const int run)
else else
{ {
/* dependent run has chosen, so we can compare */ /* dependent run has chosen, so we can compare */
if (termlistOrder (sys->runs[run].agents, int order;
sys->runs[ridSymm].agents) < 0)
order =
termlistOrder (sys->runs[run].agents,
sys->runs[ridSymm].agents);
if (order < 0)
{ {
/* we only explore the other half */ /* we only explore the other half */
return 0; return 0;
} }
if (order == 0 && sys->switchReduceClaims)
{
/* identical run; only the first would be checked for a claim */
/* so we cut off this run, including claims, turning it into a dummy run */
roleCap = removeDangling (rd, 1);
}
} }
} }
/* Special check 3: if after choosing, this run ends on (read|skippedclaim)*, we can remove that part already. /* Special check 3: if after choosing, this run ends on (read|skippedclaim)*, we can remove that part already.
*/ */
if (sys->switchReduceEndgame) if (sys->switchReduceEndgame && roleCap == NULL)
roleCap = removeIrrelevant (sys, run, rd); roleCap = removeIrrelevant (sys, run, rd);
/* Special check x: if all agents in each run send only encrypted stuff, and all agents are trusted, /* Special check x: if all agents in each run send only encrypted stuff, and all agents are trusted,

View File

@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ systemInit ()
sys->switchSymmOrder = 0; // don't force symmetry order reduction by default sys->switchSymmOrder = 0; // don't force symmetry order reduction by default
sys->switchNomoreClaims = 1; // default cutter when there are no more claims sys->switchNomoreClaims = 1; // default cutter when there are no more claims
sys->switchReduceEndgame = 1; // default cutter of last events in a trace sys->switchReduceEndgame = 1; // default cutter of last events in a trace
sys->switchReduceClaims = 1; // default remove claims from duplicate instance choosers
sys->switchClaims = 0; // default don't report on claims sys->switchClaims = 0; // default don't report on claims
sys->switchClaimToCheck = NULL; // default check all claims sys->switchClaimToCheck = NULL; // default check all claims

View File

@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ struct system
int switchSymmOrder; //!< Enable symmetry order reduction int switchSymmOrder; //!< Enable symmetry order reduction
int switchNomoreClaims; //!< Enable no more claims cutter int switchNomoreClaims; //!< Enable no more claims cutter
int switchReduceEndgame; //!< Enable endgame cutter int switchReduceEndgame; //!< Enable endgame cutter
int switchReduceClaims; //!< Symmetry reduction on claims (only works when switchAgentSymm is true)
int switchClaims; //!< Enable clails report int switchClaims; //!< Enable clails report
Term switchClaimToCheck; //!< Which claim should be checked? Term switchClaimToCheck; //!< Which claim should be checked?