- Added new heuristics based on hidelevel results.

Preliminary results:
  1. For typed matching, either heuristic 32 or 34 are best, and far
  superior to the previous best (3).
  2. For untyped matching, partial tests indicate that heuristic 1 is
  best, which is rather interesting.

src/heuristic.c

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include "system.h"
 #include "specialterm.h"
 #include "switches.h"
+#include "hidelevel.h"
 
 //! Check whether a binding (goal) is selectable
 int
@@ -205,6 +206,35 @@ term_noncevariables_level (const Term t)
     }
 }
 
+//! Determine weight based on hidelevel
+float
+weighHidelevel (const System sys, const Term t)
+{
+  unsigned int hl;
+
+  switch (hidelevelFlag (sys, t))
+    {
+    case HLFLAG_NONE:
+      return 0;
+    case HLFLAG_KNOW:
+      return 0.3;
+    case HLFLAG_PROT:
+      return 0.6;
+    }
+  return 1;
+}
+
+//! newkeylevel (weighted)
+int
+newkeylevel (const int level)
+{
+  // keylevel is from { -1,0,1 } where -1 means delay
+  if (level == 1)
+    return 0;
+  else
+    return 1;
+}
+
 //! Goal selection
 /**
  * Selects the most constrained goal.
@@ -223,6 +253,7 @@ term_noncevariables_level (const Term t)
  * 	4:	consequences determination
  * 	8:	select also single variables (that are not role variables)
  * 	16:	single variables are better
+ * 	32:	incorporate keylevel information
  *
  * special tactics for --select-goal
  *	-1:	random goal selection
@@ -320,13 +351,20 @@ select_goal_masked (const System sys)
 	      erode (1, 0.5 * (1 - b->level));
 	      // Bit 2: 4 consequence level
 	      erode (1, termBindConsequences (sys, b->term));
-	      // Bit 3: 8 single variables first
+	      // Bit 3: 8 single variables first (crappy performance, counter-intuitive anyway)
 	      erode (1, 1 - isTermVariable (b->term));
 	      // Bit 4: 16 nonce variables level (Cf. what I think is in Athena)
 	      erode (1, term_noncevariables_level (b->term));
+	      // Bit 5: 32 use hidelevel information
+	      erode (1, weighHidelevel (sys, b->term));
+	      // Bit 5: 64 use hidelevel information
+	      erode (1, 2 * weighHidelevel (sys, b->term));
+	      // Bit 6: 128 use key level
+	      erode (1, newkeylevel (b->level));
+
 	      // Define legal range
 	      if (smode > 0)
-		error ("--goal-select mode %i is illegal", mode);
+		error ("--heuristic mode %i is illegal", mode);
 
 	      // Weigh result
 	      if (buf_weight == 0 || buf_constrain <= min_constrain)

src/hidelevel.c

@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ hidelevelImpossible (const System sys, const Term goalterm)
 }
 
 //! Return flag on the basis of the Hidelevel lemma
-int
+unsigned int
 hidelevelFlag (const System sys, const Term goalterm)
 {
   unsigned int flag;

src/hidelevel.h

@@ -22,5 +22,6 @@
 void hidelevelCompute (const System sys);
 int hidelevelInteresting (const System sys, const Term goalterm);
 int hidelevelImpossible (const System sys, const Term goalterm);
+unsigned int hidelevelFlag (const System sys, const Term goalterm);
 
 #endif

src/switches.c

@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ switcher (const int process, int index, int commandline)
       if (!process)
 	{
 	  helptext ("-r, --max-runs=<int>",
-		    "maximum number of runs in the system [defaults to 5]");
+		    "maximum number of runs in the system [5]");
 	}
       else
 	{
@@ -824,14 +824,14 @@ switcher (const int process, int index, int commandline)
      }
    */
 
-  if (detect (' ', "goal-select", 1))
+  if (detect (' ', "heuristic", 1))
     {
       if (!process)
 	{
-	  /* discourage: hide
-	     helptext ("    --goal-select=<int>",
-	     "use goal selection method <int> [3]");
-	   */
+	  if (switches.expert)
+	    {
+	      helptext ("    --heuristic=<int>", "use heuristic <int> [3]");
+	    }
 	}
       else
 	{