From 3cc46f6703d67066b2dbebcd4222a8cf10755ded Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cas Cremers Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 17:18:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Complex refactoring to remove nested function due to overloading of reopen variable. This code could do with a big cleanup instead of further patching. --- src/claim.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/claim.c b/src/claim.c index 644672d..97604b2 100644 --- a/src/claim.c +++ b/src/claim.c @@ -623,6 +623,82 @@ arachne_runs_agree (const System sys, const Claimlist cl, const Termmap runs) return flag; } +// Result structure +struct flag_and_termmap +{ + int flag; + Termmap termmap; +}; + +struct flag_and_termmap +fill_roles (const System sys, const Claimlist cl, const Termmap runs_involved, + const int require_order, Termlist roles_tofill) +{ + struct flag_and_termmap ftres; + + ftres.flag = true; + ftres.termmap = runs_involved; + + if (roles_tofill == NULL) + { + // All roles have been chosen + if (arachne_runs_agree (sys, cl, runs_involved)) + { + // niagree holds + if (require_order) + { + // Stronger claim: nisynch. Test for ordering as well. + ftres.flag = labels_ordered (runs_involved, cl->prec); + } + return ftres; + } + else + { + // niagree does not hold + ftres.flag = false; + return ftres; + } + } + else + { + // Choose a run for this role, if possible + // Note that any will do + int run; + + ftres.flag = false; + for (run = 0; run < sys->maxruns; run++) + { + // Has to be from the right protocol + if (sys->runs[run].protocol == cl->protocol) + { + // Has to be the right name + if (isTermEqual + (sys->runs[run].role->nameterm, roles_tofill->term)) + { + // Choose, iterate + // Mimic lazy evaluation of earlier code + ftres.termmap = + termmapSet (ftres.termmap, roles_tofill->term, run); + + if (!ftres.flag) + { + struct flag_and_termmap ftres2; + ftres2 = + fill_roles (sys, cl, ftres.termmap, + require_order, roles_tofill->next); + if (ftres2.flag) + { + ftres.flag = ftres2.flag; + ftres.termmap = ftres2.termmap; + } + } + } + } + } + } + return ftres; +} + //! Check arachne authentications claim /** * Per default, occurs in run 0, but for generality we have left the run parameter in. @@ -635,60 +711,7 @@ arachne_claim_authentications (const System sys, const int claim_run, Claimlist cl; Roledef rd; Termmap runs_involved; - int flag; - - int fill_roles (Termlist roles_tofill) - { - if (roles_tofill == NULL) - { - // All roles have been chosen - if (arachne_runs_agree (sys, cl, runs_involved)) - { - // niagree holds - if (!require_order) - { - return 1; - } - else - { - // Stronger claim: nisynch. Test for ordering as well. - return labels_ordered (runs_involved, cl->prec); - } - } - else - { - // niagree does not hold - return 0; - } - } - else - { - // Choose a run for this role, if possible - // Note that any will do - int run, flag; - - run = 0; - flag = 0; - while (run < sys->maxruns) - { - // Has to be from the right protocol - if (sys->runs[run].protocol == cl->protocol) - { - // Has to be the right name - if (isTermEqual - (sys->runs[run].role->nameterm, roles_tofill->term)) - { - // Choose, iterate - runs_involved = - termmapSet (runs_involved, roles_tofill->term, run); - flag = flag || fill_roles (roles_tofill->next); - } - } - run++; - } - return flag; - } - } + struct flag_and_termmap ftres; #ifdef DEBUG if (DEBUGL (5)) @@ -705,10 +728,10 @@ arachne_claim_authentications (const System sys, const int claim_run, cl = rd->claiminfo; runs_involved = termmapSet (NULL, cl->roles->term, claim_run); - flag = fill_roles (cl->roles->next); + ftres = fill_roles (sys, cl, runs_involved, require_order, cl->roles->next); - termmapDelete (runs_involved); - return flag; + termmapDelete (ftres.termmap); + return ftres.flag; } //! Test niagree